teol
Full Member
Posts: 43
|
Post by teol on Oct 10, 2011 7:17:50 GMT -5
We are not on update 60 anymore I think we are on update 100 now. I think the main software name on each new release should coexist with the actual update number.
For example if a main update was released for update 110 for example I think it should be named as 1.1 to coexist with the real update number better.
I think 0.6 is way off from what I think it should be called due to the update number 100 which to me means 1.0.
|
|
|
Post by psychoraiden on Oct 10, 2011 10:10:08 GMT -5
no see every time we reach revision 100 to revision 125 we then have GUI updates and we change version numbers so right now we are on 0.6.24
|
|
|
Post by spoot on Oct 11, 2011 19:01:37 GMT -5
To be honest, we are in such a state of flux on new versions/changes the past few weeks and should be for the next few months as DG and myself work down the tickets....version number really isn't on my mind. Especially with svn move which changed the checkout numbers. After things settle down....sure.
|
|